Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ted Austin's avatar

Parameters are best guess ranges, not exactly robust science, not reality of what's happening. When the models use best guesses, it's not an attribution study, it's simply adjusting the algorithms to what they want to see or expect to see. Then they attribute the "results" to the forcings and feedbacks of their best guess ranges. Maybe that's why the models aren't very successful.

Simply simulation games that reside more in sci-fi than reality. No models projected the 20 year hiatus, we're also into a 9 year cooling trend. The models aren't designed with reality in mind.

Expand full comment
David Young's avatar

I had a post at Climate Etc. in December of last year going through the CFD literature and explaining why this lack of skill is implied by the literature.

Expand full comment
33 more comments...

No posts