4 Comments
author
Oct 18, 2023·edited Oct 18, 2023Author

I need to add this ritual point to every single post:

Note for commenters - for those who don’t understand radiative physics but think they do and want to yet again derail comment threads with how adding CO2 to the atmosphere doesn’t change the surface temperature.. head over to "Digression #3 - The "Greenhouse effect" - https://scienceofdoom.substack.com/p/digression-3-the-greenhouse-effect/ - and add your comments there. Comments here on that point will be deleted.

Expand full comment

New here. Not an expert. I'm working my way through the 3 publications below, just to give you an idea of where I am in learning something about the subject.

Do you object to people arguing that increases in CO2 do not affect the surface temperature, ... in the absence of feedbacks? Or, under any circumstances?

'Infrared radiation and planetary temperature' by Raymond T. Pierrehumbert

© 2011 American Institute of Physics, S-0031-9228-1101-010-6 January 2011 Physics Today pp. 33-38

Simple model to estimate the contribution of atmospheric CO2 to the Earth’s greenhouse effect Derrek J. Wilson and Julio Gea-Banacloche

Am. J. Phys. 80 (4), April 2012, pp. 308-315

Dependence of Earth’s Thermal Radiation on Five Most Abundant Greenhouse Gases

W. A. van Wijngaarden and W. Happer, arXiv:2006.03098v1 [physics.ao-ph] 4 Jun 2020

Expand full comment

By the way, the second reference recommended your website.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment
author

Robert, I've moved your comment to "Digression #3 - The "Greenhouse effect" - https://scienceofdoom.substack.com/p/digression-3-the-greenhouse-effect/

Expand full comment